In the name of energy conservation, Google is powering a search engine by the name of
Blackle. It has been shown that for a given monitor, the energy required to drive a screen displaying light images is greater than that of one displaying a black image. On your own, the energy savings from using Blackle are small, but multiplied by the number of Google users worldwide the effects are substantial. Based on the average number of queries received by Google on a daily basis, the result is a global savings of
8.3 Megawatt-hours a day.
posted originally from: AT:Hometech
http://www.neroogle.com/
:)
view giorgia's profile
This would only seem to work for CRT monitors. The backlight design of an LCD means that it's actually using no energy to display a white pixel, and a small voltage is applied to each of three sub-pixels to display a black pixel.
In other words the light is produced (consuming the energy) whether the LCD lets it through or not and by required a extra charge to cover the light, Blackle could actually increase energy use on a LCD monitor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_crystal_display
This is, in part, supported by Blackle's own cited study, which states "...display color is a significant determinant of on power for CRTs, but not for LCDs." (PDF pg 19). So not only do LCDs use 1/3rd to 1/2 the power of CRTs, users of LCDs can view white webpages without added watts.
On the other hand dimming the entire monitor will make a actual (if small) difference (think of power save mode' on a laptop.
view phaedrus's profile
If the savings are really true, how come Apartment Therapy Green still displays on a white background?
view CJL's profile