apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Could You Do It? 175 Sq. Ft. Apartment For Sale in NYC
New York Magazine

9-20-2009smallestapartment_.jpg

Remember when those 250 square-foot apartments were for sale in San Francisco? We thought that was small, but check out this 175 square-footer up for sale in NYC...

 
 

Now, we've lived in small studio apartments. But that was when we were single (and the studio was not quite this small). But we were renters and knew we wouldn't stay long. Buying a 175-square-foot apartment is another story entirely.

To make this work you'd have to be super resourceful, and you'd have to abandon most of your stuff—we don't see much storage space in there. Do you think you could do it?

We're thinking it would only work for a single person ... maybe a couple could pull it off (if they weren't too big on personal space). What do you think?

Oh, and it's priced at $195,000. Read more about it here.

Image: New York Magazine

Tags

design, inspiration, New York Magazine, small space, square footage, small living

Related Links

Share

Comments (26)

NO WAY. I couldn't stand staring at the same things all of the time.

posted by Icanmakeit on September 21st 2009 at 10:40pm
view Icanmakeit's profile

That's ridiculous!

posted by orrismb on September 22nd 2009 at 12:27am
view orrismb's profile

Clearly i'm a New Yorker. My reaction was "eh, pretty small, but totally do-able". I've definitely lived in rooms smaller than 15x10, but i'm not sure i'd want to BUY something like that.

posted by mh330 on September 22nd 2009 at 8:57am
view mh330's profile

My boyfriend and I currently live in 455 sq feet, which we thought was small. But at least we have different [small] rooms! This space could be manageable for one person with the creative use of a folding screen or two, and wall/ceiling storage. I'm not sure why someone would buy it to live in for more than 2 years -- unless it was to rent it out.

posted by casey w on September 22nd 2009 at 9:17am
view casey w's profile

Apparently the 250 sq ft apartments in San Fran (Cubix) went bankrupt... so much for that working out.

posted by casey w on September 22nd 2009 at 9:22am
view casey w's profile

We live in about 200 sq. ft. With 2 pit bulls! Totally do-able.

posted by hulahulagirl on September 22nd 2009 at 11:24am
view hulahulagirl's profile

There was a 130 sq ft apartment for sale in Sydney for a year. I was very tempted to buy it, mostly for the challenge. I still sit down with drawing pads designing HOW I would live in it if I had it.

The challenge is huge and the paring down would be cathartic.

posted by weckster on September 22nd 2009 at 5:43pm
view weckster's profile

You could do it this way:

- Use the 'two twin beds made up with cushions to look like a couch' idea. Daytime, corner sofa. Night-time, double bed. Set-up can be changed by just pushing them together.

- No books, no TV, just a media centre/computer in a nice wall unit. Watch TV on-line, rent dvds, download music, buy an ebook reader and manage your library digitally. All the entertainment you could ask for, on a hard drive.

- Make a DIY closet out of cabinets with doors. Put a tabletop on top of it, and get some high stools. Voila, table for six.

So, put your table/wardrobe as a room divider parallel to the kitchen, put your media centre on one of the walls and arrange your bench/couch/bed opposite. You could totally do it.

posted by JoannaC on September 22nd 2009 at 9:57pm
view JoannaC's profile

My husband and I moved to Korea a month ago and our (free) apartment is about this size. Luckily the paring down happened before we got here, but it's going to be a challenge to make it comfortable. Our current plan is to have our bed on the far side of the room from the door, and use a wardrobe (there's no closet) and a bookcase to divide the space so we can have an eating/living section, too.
The wallpaper, on the other hand, is kind of... well, it's a problem. And the floors.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3490/3866810852_438ec1777e.jpg

posted by Pippienna on September 23rd 2009 at 12:04am
view Pippienna's profile

We returned from a short trip to Japan recently stayed on real Japanese futons all but 1 of the 8 nights and are wondering if it is possible to buy those in the US, specifically New York. That's certainly one way to make such a small unit work!

posted by whytravel on September 23rd 2009 at 11:23am
view whytravel's profile

Crazy. Really have to be creative with this space!

http://smallspaceresources.blogspot.com

posted by ldmortensen on September 23rd 2009 at 12:32pm
view ldmortensen's profile

WHAT A RIP-OFF!!!!

posted by AcrossThePond on September 23rd 2009 at 1:13pm
view AcrossThePond's profile

Someone should buy it and make an art project out of it. Different architects and designers would be invited to have residences where they would transform the space and live in it at the same time culminating in an opening and a series of open studio days.

posted by McGregor-Mento on September 23rd 2009 at 1:31pm
view McGregor-Mento's profile

Totally depends on the location. Those SF condos were in a lousy up and coming area.

posted by etslee on September 23rd 2009 at 3:24pm
view etslee's profile

Before we were married my husband & I lived on the UWS of NYC in a 9'x12' apartment (not including small bathroom). We were there for 18 months. Most of our "stuff" was in storage in California but we found many great ways of finding spaces for everything. The ceilings were 14' tall though so we could put the bed over the "kitchen" area. He even worked at home! Great memories and I'm glad we did it but don't think I could do it forever =/

It would make a great "vacation" home if anyone had the money these days for something like that =)

posted by karandash on September 23rd 2009 at 3:57pm
view karandash's profile

Of course I could do it... but I call those dorms, not apartments.

posted by starky on September 23rd 2009 at 7:16pm
view starky's profile

$195,000???? Gee, I only want $150,000 for my 2208 sq ft house on 6 acres which I can't seem find a buyer for. NYC is obviously out of my price range!!

posted by williamsweyr on September 23rd 2009 at 7:54pm
view williamsweyr's profile

I plan to buy it, then deco it up and win the next small cool contest.

posted by funstraw on September 24th 2009 at 1:25am
view funstraw's profile

the cubix apartments in sf are only about two blocks from where i work. not exactly a crumby up and coming 'hood, but mostly businesses and already "there". they came available just as the credit/real estate crash was hitting...simply bad timing for what is basically a good idea.

as for this, it's a hotel room with a very big mini bar. probably better suited for somebody who lives in the 'burbs and needs a place in town to crash during the week, or as a vacation type place.

if you could manage living in a place this small full time, god bless you.

posted by davidsl on September 24th 2009 at 11:31am
view davidsl's profile

Laughable price, but 175sf? No problem with a good floorplan. I've lived quite comfortably having 5 person dinner parties, in 2 different studio apartments that were 173 and 136 sf respectively. In fact, I would have to express a strong preference for the smaller one which had a much better layout.

posted by chakapakuni on September 24th 2009 at 3:20pm
view chakapakuni's profile

I forgot to add, my partner grew up in Japan in a 600sf apartment in a family of 4, or about 150 sf each. In the 1970's it was apparently considered quite luxurious in terms of space.

posted by chakapakuni on September 24th 2009 at 3:23pm
view chakapakuni's profile

Yes I could but would need storage for 99% of what own.

Needs a PS3 as your entertainment center, a huge LCD TV, a sofa bed, small table, couldnt cook in there it would be unbearable I would prepare cold foods and eat them hot food I would eat out a lot. Acouple of your favorite books clothes, and small garment rail. and a picture for the wall.

Have I forgotten something. A good job so your cream crackered when you get home.

Looks great.

posted by poppasmurf on September 25th 2009 at 2:44am
view poppasmurf's profile

In the advert is states $170 a month for maintenance what is this for some one to act as boss of the building?

posted by poppasmurf on September 25th 2009 at 2:48am
view poppasmurf's profile

@poppasmurf: Not entirely sure what you're asking (punctuation helps in communication), but that's just another $170 that you're shelling out on top of the mortgage payments. It's the equivalent of a homeowners' association fee in newer neighborhoods - payments to take care of the common areas (in this case a yard, stairs, the elevator, etc).

posted by PhilMills on September 25th 2009 at 4:52pm
view PhilMills's profile

I agree - it would make a great vacation/crash pad, if someone had the money to shell out. Or a great first-time place, but at $175K and a slim chance of re-selling, why not keep renting?

posted by InMadison on September 28th 2009 at 1:47pm
view InMadison's profile

Not only could I do it, but I have done smaller. At least it has a bathroom INSIDE. They are building homes around this size now, too. I think it's cool. People don't need 5,000 sq.ft houses. The planet doesn't need people who think they need 5,000 sq.ft houses.

By non NYC/SanFran/other expensive cities standards, this is not absolute market insanity. My friend pays upwards of 2300 for rent alone in NYC, and her studio is not much bigger than that one. I could see why buying would make sense. Usually, it's the smarter use of money.

Still, I wouldn't buy it. Lol and I couldn't buy it either with all my student loans!

posted by hopeinbrokelyn on September 29th 2009 at 3:44pm
view hopeinbrokelyn's profile