apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Please Do Not Add Self-Linking Signatures to Comments
A Note From Our Editorial Team

Re-Nest has a growing, active community, and we appreciate all of you. But we need to address an issue that is becoming more common. We notice that many community members sign their comments with a link to their blog or site, and we would like to ask you to please not to do so.

 
 

If you have a specific link on your blog or site that advances or augments the discussion in a comment thread, that is fine to include. But please do not include an automatic signature or purely self-promotional link with your comment. This makes comment threads unnecessarily long, and there is a place in your personal Apartment Therapy profile to add a link to your website. Please use that to share information about your own site. Comments are for commenting only!

As editors we do not have the ability to snip or edit comments, so comments violating this aspect of our comment policy will be deleted. (You can view our full comment policy here.) The comment threads are for interaction on topics, and we appreciate you staying on topic! Thank you!

Tags

NEWS, comments

Share

Comments (12)

Good that the issue is being addressed...long awaited!

posted by susrith on November 24th 2009 at 11:50am
view susrith's profile

Then can you all do US a favor?

Make sure the "Related Links" sections of new posts are exactly that, and not just random links intended to get your search result numbers up...?

Oh yeah, and do a better job about clearing spam posts faster.

posted by patrick (the other one) on November 24th 2009 at 11:55am
view patrick (the other one)'s profile

patrick (the other one), the Related Posts under the Tags heading are automatically generated, and we wish they were better. That is the reason we started implementing our own Related Posts at the conclusion of our posts, and we really try to make those as relevant as possible.

posted by CambriaNYAT on November 24th 2009 at 12:46pm
view CambriaNYAT's profile

Oh, so it's okay for you guys to use automated technology to create link opportunities (hence increasing your placement on searches) that bring absolutely no value-add to the post's content, but it's not okay for your readers to benignly do the same thing?

I get it now.

posted by patrick (the other one) on November 24th 2009 at 12:52pm
view patrick (the other one)'s profile

patrick, I'm surprised by your tone, especially considering how supportive Apartment Therapy has been of you and your work. I disagree that the Related Posts don't bring any value. All of the generated Related Posts have the same top category as the post just written, with the hope that it will be of further interest to our readers. Is it a perfect system? No. But we're working to improve it.

posted by CambriaNYAT on November 24th 2009 at 1:16pm
view CambriaNYAT's profile

Wow Patrick...such harsh words. If you don't like what is posted, then stop following the site. It's called Freedom to Choose.

And looking at your most recent posts - you seem to post negative comments more often than postitive ones. In the spirit of Thanksgiving...why not find something to be thankful for...

posted by Kerstin on November 24th 2009 at 1:58pm
view Kerstin's profile

Cambria, I know that if I had something being automatically generated on my website of which I had no control over and "wished were better" I wouldn't be displaying the item at all.

posted by jefflewis on November 24th 2009 at 2:50pm
view jefflewis's profile

i dont mind the signatures at the end of people's relevant comments. There have been a couple of blogs that I've found through them when I've found a person's comment to be interesting.

What gets me though are the people who say
"I was just talking about this on my blog! www.blah.com" or "I tried it and blogged about it, read my post!". Those comments are a waste of space. Wish there was a way to stop those.

posted by chusmabilly on November 24th 2009 at 4:59pm
view chusmabilly's profile

And, Cambria, Apartment Therapy has surprised *me* several times in spite of how supportive *I* have been to the site, Maxwell, his book, his events, and how many times I have gone to bat for editors, over the years... so I guess we can call it even.

Kerstin--
Apologies for offending you. Yes, freedom of choice, I get it. But this is also a forum for discussion and (egads!) civil disagreement, and I have exercised that right as well.

posted by patrick (the other one) on November 24th 2009 at 8:34pm
view patrick (the other one)'s profile

Does anyone read Seth Godin? Truly helpful post this week on "How to lose an argument online."

http://sethgodin.typepad.com/

posted by wallace on November 25th 2009 at 12:27am
view wallace's profile

I don't see the harm in the signatures that contain links. I don't believe post length is the issue either. How much space does this actually take? If it's an issue of competition, I'd respect you more if you just said so--we don't want to support diverting people from a site we own and profit from (makes sense to me). If it's not wanting to spend the time sifting through legit comments by legit posters with links versus meaningless spam posts that exist only to divert readers to another site, then why not tell us that.

And for the record, I don't have a blog or design business to advertise here, so a no links policy is no loss to me.

posted by kelleyk on November 25th 2009 at 1:08pm
view kelleyk's profile

And for the record, nor do I.

posted by patrick (the other one) on November 25th 2009 at 6:33pm
view patrick (the other one)'s profile