apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Wal-Mart Pushes for Green Labels
The New York Times 7.15.09

walmart.jpg

Is Wal-Mart turning over a new leaf? It looks like they're trying. According to The New York Times, Wal-Mart is on a mission to go green, developing a universal rating system that scores each of their products on its social and environmental impact — kind of like green nutrition labels. They apparently intend to go beyond the standard sustainability concerns, like emissions and water conservation, and actually delve into more complex questions, like "Did this T-shirt come from a cotton crop that was sprayed with pesticide?" and "Was excessive packaging used to ship these diapers?"

 
 

This almost seems at first like a greenwashing ploy, but we have to admit that maybe we're still holding on to a grudge against Wal-Mart. As The New York Times writes, "The only thing less likely than a Wal-Mart meeting [a "sustainability meeting" as described by Michael T. Duke, Wal-Mar's President and Chief Executive] that sounds as if it were dreamed up by liberal-arts environmentalists may be that a number of scholars and environmental groups say that Wal-Mart is the only entity capable of making “sustainable consumption” a retailing reality."

Wow. If that's a case, then this could truly be a break-through. Wal-Mart is recognizing that more and more consumers are making purchasing decisions not only based on price, but also sustainability factors and environmental issues. We'll see if it happens. This whole plan is still years in the making.

Read the whole article at The New York Times.

What do you think about this?

Image: Newsday.com

Tags

NEWS, Information, Wal-Mart

Related Links

Share

Comments (5)

Suspicious. WHat about all their plastic crap and the fuel used to transport things from China?

posted by alexis on July 16th 2009 at 1:40pm
view alexis's profile

Well, I just bought a Nordicware half sheet pan from Walmart that proclaims "we practice green manufacturing". I'm not sure how "green" working aluminum can be. At least it was made in the US.

posted by Helen Claire on July 16th 2009 at 3:00pm
view Helen Claire's profile

Hey, something is better than nothing. As a friend of mine says, don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. :)

posted by odlaram7 on July 16th 2009 at 4:42pm
view odlaram7's profile

They are more of a cost competitive company and depend a lot on cheap imports i am not sure how far this can work for them...however, if it is an honest effort..then great!

posted by susrith on July 16th 2009 at 5:59pm
view susrith's profile

They have been steadily working on "green" things for the last couple of years now. They are even trying to source 100% of their fish from MSC certified fisheries (compare that to Trader Joe's selling 15 of 22 red list seafood species). I was surprised to learn of the major NGO environmental groups that have set up shop in Arkansas to be close to their HQ to do consulting with them.

Yeah, they are making a profit, but why shouldn't they? I guess with these labels they want people to know the products are "greener".

posted by slipperymarshmallow on July 23rd 2009 at 2:07pm
view slipperymarshmallow's profile