apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Wood Burning Fireplace Ban in Montreal?
Montreal Gazette

0316_fireplace1.jpg

From the Montreal Gazette's green living column, Green Life, we read the recent piece, Falling out of Love with Fireplaces, by Michelle Lalonde. It's all about the environmental pollution caused by the wood burning appliances in our homes and the movement in Montreal to ban them...

 
 

Michelle expressed what she once thought, which was always our understanding, too: "I'd always known wood burning was a source of pollution, but I assumed industrial and transportation emissions were the real concerns in the city... But about 10 years ago, Montreal's public-health department started publishing some shocking studies revealing just how significant a pollution source wood burning is here on the island. One study showed that suburban neighbourhoods like Rivière des Prairies, where wood burning was a prevalent home-heating source, had poorer air quality than downtown Montreal, with all its traffic."

While the city of Montreal has proposed a by-law that would ban new installations of wood-burning appliances, local environmental groups want to do more to stop the pollution that is already occuring: These groups propose allowing seven years for residents with wood-burning stoves and fireplaces to replace, remove, or disable them.

This was eye-opening for us and made us begin to reconsider the appeal of the wood burning fireplace. Read the full story here. Photo: Peter Battistoni, Canwest News Service

posted originally from: AT:Chicago

Tags

NEWS

Related Links

Share

Comments (6)

When I read this I first felt a feeling of dismay, having a wonderful wood burning fireplace myself, but in reality a gas fireplace is much safer, cleaner (in all ways), and efficient. I think it's a good move.

posted by missdk on March 18th 2009 at 10:59am
view missdk's profile

A gas fireplace is NOT cleaner in all ways - it produces more greenhouse gases.

A 2003 Australian study on greenhouse gas emissions from domestic wood fires showed that burning wood creates up to 10 times fewer greenhouse gas emissions per unit of heat than other sources. The Australian Greenhouse Office has the following figures for carbon produced by heating methods (per heat unit):

Natural gas produces 0.31 kg.
LPG gas produces 0.34 kg.
Heating Oil produces 0.39 kg...
Electricity Aust. Average 1.00 kg...
Wood produces 0.00 kg.

People should replace *open* fires, which are inefficient in heating terms, and which produced particulate emissions, with fan-forced combustion heaters, which greatly reduce particulate emissions, not with gas fires which come with huge (if less visible to the average consumer than the wood smoke) problems of their own.

posted by Rebekkap on March 19th 2009 at 8:08pm
view Rebekkap's profile

sad...there are so many other battles to fight. I'm sure there are many environmentalists that have fireplaces.

posted by art on March 19th 2009 at 8:21pm
view art's profile

The Australian study was very superficial and ignored methane from burning wood.

A Scandinavian study did much more detailed research and measured emissions from a range of stoves. Those measurements showed that a smoky wood stove can cause twice as much global warming just from methane emissions as heating two similar houses with oil. That's on top of the toxic fine particle pollution - more than would be emitted by 200 passenger cars.

Wood stoves also increase global warming because neighbours are forced to move out of town to avoid the smoke from other peoples' stoves (many doctors recommend this) and drive long distances to work. Other neighbours have to increase electricity use to run fans and filters, drive to doctor’s surgeries to get treatment for illnesses caused by wood smoke, and dry clothes indoors because they smell like a cigarette factory if hung outside on the washing line.

For the sake of our health and the climate, we should all fall out of love with fireplaces. But that doesn't mean we can't use wood as a renewable fuel. Domestic stoves may cause more global warming than oil or gas, but combined heat and power stations (cogeneration or trigeneration) are designed for high, temperature efficient burning and can be fitted with filters so that they can heat and power 100 houses for the same pollution as 1 domestic wood stove.

The real battle is ignorance. If people knew that even the new EPA-certified wood stoves emit as much toxic fine particle pollution as 100 cars, hardly anyone would use them. No need to argue, just work together to save the planet!

posted by Environmentalist on March 24th 2009 at 7:40pm
view Environmentalist's profile

I love seeing fireplaces.
In the UK where I stay the higher end homes still have them.

We recently completed a job and the fireplace place was huge.
If you go to our site
http://www.professionalpainter.co.uk

The video shows a job we recently completed,it has said fireplace in it.
The ceilings are 10.5ft approx so you can gauge how grand the fireplace is.

This site is a great find I look forward to the weekly newsletters.

Thank you.

From
Mark In Aberdeen Scotland (where the weather is always cold!)

posted by ThePainterman on March 30th 2009 at 10:29am
view ThePainterman's profile

I'm looking at an apartment right now in downtown montreal. Like many, it has a fireplace that I won't be able to use. Kind of upsetting.

posted by colinsick on June 5th 2009 at 1:19pm
view colinsick's profile